假爱真婚 小说 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 喜剧片 内地 1995

导演: 干露露   

剧情介绍

  喜剧,讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人,周旋于女友和未来岳父之间,因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人,认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
  Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
  Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
  The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
  Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
  Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
  Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
  In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
  On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

评论:

  • 戴惜蕊 7小时前 :

    熟悉的是枝裕和风格,运镜、色彩、音乐和克制的氛围——虽然故事换了个发生地点,但也算南韩演技派顶配阵容了,因此电影在气质上也尽可能少了些违和感——其实按照这个剧本,年纪再往前10年的阿部宽,宫崎葵,安藤樱,福山雅治来围炉夜话,估计就对味了;// 这种小小的无伤大雅的违和感该怎么形容呢:日影的文艺感是温和深邃有时光来托重的——它可以下沉的相当彻底;而韩影的文艺感失去了些因文化积淀而产生的必然性——富五代和富二代的区别。

  • 充欣然 9小时前 :

    我愣是没看出来在饼叔这片里咋能突出到拿影帝,裴斗娜在半开的车窗上玩花瓣那个镜头有点意思

  • 冬漫 2小时前 :

    像是是枝裕和导演的铁粉,模仿了一个《小偷家族》元素的命题作业。大导演脱离了母语创作环境,就算视听层面上过关,片子还是呈现悬浮的状态,很难沉下来,主题上真正的触及心灵,只剩下观感还可以的技巧展示。

  • 嘉恒 3小时前 :

    拍得好节省、好工整、好心机,不就是把《小偷家族》翻拍公路版嘛,何必呢老是!

  • 接访烟 3小时前 :

    不知道外國人啥感想,反正本看日劇的只想把坂元裕二的woman拍到失智臉上,出身不幸還單身帶娃只會最後帶到絕症,後續都給你想好了,就說別生了!!!!PS結局令我感到找了一群韓國人拍晨間劇

  • 印浩宕 0小时前 :

    我觉得,«掮客»的意义,其实不在于阵容如何,导演如何,演员如何,题材如何,而是它提供了一个新的角度去审视生命。新生的生命、死亡的生命、被抛弃的生命、被守护的生命、不被理解的生命、得到谅解的生命……为什么人们总是会对孩子说:谢谢你来到这个世界,而从来不对一个成年人说,谢谢你来到这个世界呢?每一个大人都是曾经的孩子啊。从这一点上,整部电影对于生命的讨论已经不仅仅只是被遗弃的孩子上,而是普及到了每一个人身上。

  • 卫昉宽 2小时前 :

    连是枝裕和都开始了这样,没有故事强编故事。反正有大把老底慢慢消耗。

  • 公西半香 4小时前 :

    停留在车窗上的花儿 小心翼翼能捏住 甩甩手也能把它撵走 但孩子却是一辈子的牵挂。素英在【生下来送出去】还是【存在就毁掉】哪个罪恶感更重的伦理线徘徊 得不出答案 东洙被问到【更远是哪里】也同样答不上来 也许一起洗车时开个窗大家都湿透了是快乐 窝在小镜头前合照一张留念是快乐 也许游乐场狂欢一下小游戏是快乐——也许只是大家凑在一起说说话一起笑笑就是快乐 本就这么简单不是吗?所以呀 摩天轮上用手挡在你面前 不是想给你打马赛克 因为你给了我太多可以原谅妈妈的理由 我只是简单的不想看到你哭 只愿 全天下的人 都能因为出生而得到感谢。(PS裴斗娜的侧脸好好看。IU也意外演得不错!)

  • 剧静婉 2小时前 :

    没有觉得是枝裕和水土不服,但是也没有觉得很出彩。IU大女主,裴斗娜的角色不够出彩,但IU又演得无关痛痒。宋康昊这一部得的影帝,感觉是综合了其他影片……觉得小男孩也是很重要的角色,可是海报里都没有出现他。

  • 支青曼 1小时前 :

    脱离实际,有点假大空。宋康昊演技没有得到发挥,竟然还能得戛纳影帝,有点不可思议

  • 伟辞 9小时前 :

    从头看到尾,内心竟然毫无波动。这个“掮客家族”真的没有化学反应,因为过程中缺乏情感变化的支撑,摩天轮、旅馆两场走心戏好则好矣,也没能托起整部片子。

  • 元晴雪 7小时前 :

    “姓名”无法界定身份和归属——是枝裕和用这样的暗喻试图合理化他走向国际的创作路径,但他无法淡化强烈的作者印记。这个“韩国”故事看起来不够韩国,之所以成立,依然要感谢人类社会共同相信的某种普世价值体系。

  • 婷春 3小时前 :

    809 伪中年危机题材,有趣的点在于,这个故事确实是为Nicolas Cage量身打造的,对于中年以上的观影者来说会有双重代入感。 不过正常的套路是“从头再来”,在这里变成了无厘头

  • 扶隽美 0小时前 :

    罪恶的事情却拍的这么温情,了解一下我们的计划生育,呵呵

  • 明嘉庆 8小时前 :

    想知道如果凱奇看完劇本以後不同意出演,導演會怎麼辦

  • 徐晓昕 6小时前 :

    是枝裕和重复自己《小偷家族》里同样的命题——拼凑起的家庭是否也有真挚的感情,残破的角落里是否也能开出绚丽的花朵。其实每个人都是互相对应,充斥着难以言说的经历,生活底层的他们在人性的边缘徘徊,追踪的警察在人性与职责之间挣扎;男二在与抛弃孩子的女主的经历中,与抛弃自己的母亲和解;而女主在罪恶感与责任感之间渴望给孩子一个最好的家。“谢谢你来到这世上”也许是最温存的祝福。好的地方是一如既往的,其实并没有水土不服,只是在重复自己,以致于看之前就猜到大致剧情走向了。

  • 局凡双 7小时前 :

    依然是无血缘关系的临时家庭,结局差点意思。

  • 元晴雪 9小时前 :

    冲着是枝裕和看的,结果有点失望。一如既往的温情犯罪家庭片,但比起小偷家族掉段了太多。人物动机不够有说服力(天台讨论是该堕胎还是遗弃那段真给我气笑了,搁东亚整prolife anti-abortion呢)。iu演技太平

  • 刀半兰 8小时前 :

    感觉其实没很好也没那么差,其实导演和凯奇都是很自知的,商业电影也就这样了,特别喜欢LSD那一段对话。

  • 卫昆 3小时前 :

    戛纳评委太惨了,看了话痨片《未来罪行》又要看大闷片《掮客》。一部去精华版《小偷家族》,一个毫无意义的无聊剧本。表演也没有亮点,所有人都是一副苦瓜脸,姜栋元和IU如同两块木头,宋康昊稍好一点,戛纳影帝没问题,但不该凭这部片子拿。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved